|
|
Post by HazelNut on Nov 24, 2004 19:18:17 GMT -5
SON says to look for another controversial pairing on B&B. Who could that be? We've had Rick & Caitlin. We still have Amber & Thomas & Jackie & Deacon. What two other characters could be a controversial couple?
|
|
|
|
Post by 1Nikki on Nov 25, 2004 9:51:29 GMT -5
Maybe Deacon will drop Jackie & go after Stephanie. I think that would qualify as controversial.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tina on Nov 25, 2004 22:38:54 GMT -5
I'm trying to think of some outrageous ideas, but I have no idea! They said they've been sharing a lot of scenes recently, Sally and Nick? LOL. geez I have no idea. LOL.
|
|
|
|
Post by jbl2471 on Nov 26, 2004 12:52:54 GMT -5
They originally brought Caitlin on to be with Eric
Since they wrote Rick off maybe they'll try Eric/Caitlin
|
|
|
|
Post by ConAMC on Nov 26, 2004 15:42:11 GMT -5
Deacon & Stephanie is my DREAM couple! You just know she's got a wild streak and he's ready to break it.
This is why I love B&B, you get all these couples you wouldn't get on other soaps. I love it!
|
|
|
|
Post by Shannon on Nov 26, 2004 23:39:07 GMT -5
Sorry but Deacon and Stephanie would=major gag fest, lol. Anyway these controversial pairings could be possible: Stephanie and Deacon Stephanie and Nick Bridget and Nick RJ's babysitter and Ridge(GOD NO!) Eric and Caitlin maybe(YUCK!) Maybe Brooke and Thomas(they do this and I'm done with the b&b for good, I swear!) Okay, gotta quit now! This is making me nauseous  |
|
|
|
Post by BoandHopeBrady on Nov 30, 2004 1:23:07 GMT -5
Thorne and Sally, maybe? They are nuts enough to do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shannon on Nov 30, 2004 22:37:12 GMT -5
Thorne and Sally, maybe? They are nuts enough to do it. I never thought of that one! I don't think that tptb will go there though, because Sally loves Darla as if she's her own daughter, and wants her to be happy. If she stole Thorne from her, that would be defeating the whole purpose. If tptb DO decide to pursue this, their nuts! |
|
|
|
Post by Shannon on Nov 30, 2004 22:38:10 GMT -5
I wonder if the new controversial pairing will be Samantha and Eric. Ugh, I hope not.........
|
|
|
|
Post by BoandHopeBrady on Dec 2, 2004 12:14:10 GMT -5
I never thought of that one! I don't think that tptb will go there though, because Sally loves Darla as if she's her own daughter, and wants her to be happy. If she stole Thorne from her, that would be defeating the whole purpose. If tptb DO decide to pursue this, their nuts! Sally may love Darla, but that doesn't mean anything according to the way the soaps are. |
|
|
|
Post by yellowrose on Dec 4, 2004 7:08:34 GMT -5
Samantha and Eric.
Sam is unhappy because she wants a Beverly Hills lifestyle and Eric is willing to give it to her.
Why else would he take her out for cavier(sp) at lunch?
Eric is overdue for a dilly-dally anyway. He has to break out every couple of years so that Steph can moan and groan and then they can get married again.
I want to puke every time they have one of their famous Forrester weddings and have to recite their own vows.....It's always the same.Someone reads from a Bible which you know is the only time they pick one up. Then "It's FOREVER!"Sure it is,til the next time.
|
|
