|
|
Post by Aphrodite on Sept 12, 2004 9:24:14 GMT -5
She looked like she was going to hurl at dinner the other day. And she was craving pepperoncini. Is it just me or is she a little old to be having kids? And is it possible to have two children 40 years apart?
|
|
|
|
Post by DebbieCee on Sept 12, 2004 11:29:41 GMT -5
If Sally could have a baby a little over 10 years ago then Jackie's not too old. This is B&B after all. Anything's possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowrose on Sept 12, 2004 13:11:05 GMT -5
I think you are right,but only because Deacon is so fertile. I hadn't noticed Jackie acting like she might be pregnant.
I think as long as a woman hasn't been through menapause,she can get pregnant.Some women go through it earlier than others. My friends daughter had her only child after she was 40.
I did good to not beat mine when I was young,I would hate to think I would have went through raising a child AFTER 40!!
But,then Jackie has the butler to help her.I didn't have that.
|
|
Cheap21
Full Member
Aidan, Kendall, Babe and Jamie lover
Posts: 105
|
Post by Cheap21 on Sept 12, 2004 13:27:15 GMT -5
Jackie is at least in her late 50s. Theres no way she could seriously be pregnant
|
|
|
|
Post by TresRene on Sept 13, 2004 10:04:25 GMT -5
If she is pregnant I hope it's Deacon's baby & she'll leave Massimo to be with Deacon.
|
|
